mUltimate Chopin

Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 166-203
p. 1, b. 1-31
p. 2, b. 32-73
p. 3, b. 74-111
p. 4, b. 112-138
p. 5, b. 139-165
p. 6, b. 166-203
p. 7, b. 204-241
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition

  b. 190-191

New slur in GC (literal reading) & FE (→EE)

Slur continued in GC (interpretation→GE)

Providing bar 191 with a separate slur can be an echo of the original slurring (cf., e.g., the slurs in bars 45-48). The notation of GC suggests that the slurs could have been combined by Chopin in [A], which was misunderstood in FE (→EE). 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, Inaccuracies in GC

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FED, FES
Complete ➔