![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-31
FE1 - First French edition
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
The absence of in FE (→EE) must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Most likely, it is a non-corrected oversight of the engraver, although one cannot entirely exclude the possibility that the sign was added by Chopin in GC. In turn, no
in GE1 is a patent oversight. See also bars 5 and 18-19.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: No initial dynamic marking, Errors in GE, GE revisions, Authentic corrections in GC
notation: Verbal indications
Missing markers on sources:
FESch, FED, FES