![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The sources do not state clearly which quaver is affected by the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The differences between GC, FE (→EE1) and GE seem to be accidental inaccuracies. The solution we suggest in the main text is an attempt to reconstruct [A] on the basis of the discrepancies between GC and FE. The same range of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Both versions were created directly on the basis of the notation of [A], hence, unless the notation was unclear, one of the versions is most probably erroneous. To the main text we choose the version of GC, which is devoid of gaps in phrasing. On the other hand, the difference between the versions could have been caused by the ambiguity of the notation of [A] (caused by, e.g. corrections). In such a situation, both GC and FE may correctly convey certain aspects of this notation, which leads to our alternative suggestion, which combines the completeness of the slurring of GC with the continuity of the slur of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 74-75
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is difficult to determine what led to the difference in slurring between GC (→GE) and FE (→EE). The notation of [A] could have been ambiguous, e.g. between the lines. In the main text we give the continuous slur of GC, since there is no visible musical reason to disrupt this rhythmically homogeneous, smoothly descending sequence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Embracing slurs , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 151-152
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of each of these bars, GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) have no naturals. The necessary signs – before a1 and a – were added in GE, FE4 and EE (in EE1 only in bar 152). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |