Issues : Errors in GE
b. 108-109
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is not certain whether the slur was added by Chopin in GC or overlooked in FE1 (→FE2). Anyways, the Chopinesque proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) and of the base text to EE does not leave any doubts concerning Chopin's intention. Cf. bars 109-110. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 113-115
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
No hairpin is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1, unnoticed in GE2 as well. In the main text we give the range of the sign according to GC, in which it starts from the beginning of the motif. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GE, there is no crotchet rest for the lower voice on the last beat, which could be the engraver's oversight (see the complete record in bars 112-114) or a revision – GE omitted the corresponding rest also in the analogous bar 107. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |