Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurring of GC is certainly incomplete and it was completed already in GE. In the main text we give the slur of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||||||
|
b. 175-177
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with FE, which is also based on [A], suggests that the earlier division of the slur in GC (→GE) is erroneous. The copyist's momentary distraction is also supported by the misplaced category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors of GC |
||||||||||||
|
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||||||||
|
b. 215-218
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in the previous bars, the slurring of GC is very careless in these bars. GE1 printed only three slurs, which was completed in GE2, almost literally reproducing GC. The remaining editions contain correct slurs, only FE1 (→FE2) overlooked the slur at the transition between bars 217 and 218. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||
|
b. 217
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC (→GE1) the bar includes only 5 crotchets, as the copyist overlooked the third chord. The mistake was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
hairpin, one bar too early (see the previous note). Irrespective of the position of the division, we consider the interpretation of the sources that reproduced it as coinciding slurs to be inaccurate; in the main text we interpret the first slur as a tenuto-slur and end it still in b. 176. It corresponds to the notation of 
