



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 81
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is hard to state whether the absence of staccato dots in GE is a result of an oversight or of a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 87-88
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The wedge in GC is very clear, so both the omission of the sign in GE1 and the fact of replacing it with a dot in GE2 are surprising. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dot in all sources except for GC is probably a result of the engravers' inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 93-96
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The original accentuation, which, together with the slurs restores clear, triple grouping of chords after bars 91-92, prevailing in bars 81-90, was changed by Chopin in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4). The new concept is an evident improvement – it shapes a four-bar-long crescendo wave with distinctly marked two crests and at the same time it delays the return of denser accentuated motifs until the entrance of the final phrase of the exposition in bar 97. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in GC |