![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of GC
b. 126
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC (→GE) has a b-b1 octave as the 4th quaver in the bar. The comparison with the motifs in the adjacent bars (as well as in bars 133-135) almost certainly indicates a mistake of the copyist. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC and FE1 (→FE2→EE) lack in the accidental before the 3rd crotchet in the L.H. Patent in this context Chopin's mistake was corrected in GE and FE3 (→FE4). Moreover, FE1 overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The structure of the figuration in the entire passage in the L.H. (bars 153-156 and 157-160), and particularly the comparison with analogous bar 159, indicate a mistake of the copyist in this place. The absence of a correction in GE may be attributed to the absent category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 156
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
At the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar before the bottom note of the second, GC and FE1 (→FE2) have one category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
b. 157-158
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slurs in GC (→GE1) must be an oversight – the copyist wrote only the part of the slur starting in b. 158, at the beginning of a new line, overlooking the slurring of b. 157. GE2 limited itself to adding slurs in b. 157 (most probably by analogy with b. 153) – the already printed slur in b. 158 was left unchanged. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC , Uncertain slur continuation |