Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 69-72
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The premature ending of the dashes is certainly an error of GE1. According to us, also in the case of FE (→EE) the engraver's inaccuracy seems to be the most likely the reason of the absence of the dashes – they were led only to the end of the line of the text (cf., e.g., the Etude in C minor, Op. 25 No. 12, bars 33-39). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 70-71
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Both the earlier division of the slurs in GE1 and the later beginning of the slur in EE are undoubtedly misreadings of their Stichvorlagen. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 ends a page on bar 71, and the slur reaches the end of that bar. This may suggest a possible continuation of the slur in the next bar or a tenuto ending of the slur. In bar 72 a new slur starts from the beginning of the bar in support of the latter, and that is how we reproduce it in our system. In any case this amounts to the engraver's inaccuracy, amended in GE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Tenuto slurs |
||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC the part of the R.H. is written in this bar one octave lower, as the copyist forgot to end the octave sign in the new line of the text. All the remaining sources include the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
1-d