![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The divided slurs in GE are probably an incorrect interpretation of the slurs of GC between the lines – although the beginning of the slur in b. 79 is harder to see in the copy, there is no doubt that the slur was meant to be continued. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The interpretation of the top slur in GC is not straightforward. In this rhythmical context, its leading to the final semiquaver seems natural. However, this would produce a concurrence of slurs on that semiquaver, which the notation of GC does not suggest, and what does not occur in any other source. It is therefore possible that the slur has a double meaning – similarly to the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Each of the three source versions of the range of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 80-81
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The phrasing slur over both d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 81
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is hard to state whether the absence of staccato dots in GE is a result of an oversight or of a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |