Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 94-97
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 101-104
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The pedalling of the last two chords of the exposition is marked in the sources inaccurately or erroneously. In FE there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC does not have a quaver flag here, which is most probably an error of the copyist. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 112-114
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC the second quaver in the R.H. is written too low in all of these bars, so it could be interpreted as an F or F category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 124
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of the bar GC and FE lack in accidentals in the part of the R.H. The inaccuracy of Chopin's notation was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
sign in bar 101. In 
sign in bar 104, whereas in 
. The respective notes in the L.H. allow to guess the correct text, although in bar 113, the note in the L.H. is also written incorrectly as an A