Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The chord filling this bar has an erroneous value of a minim in GC. It may prove the copyist's having confused bars 41 and 42. The mistake was corrected already in GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The arpeggio sign is already present in FE1, based directly on [A], and almost certainly uncorrected by Chopin. This suggests the absence of the sign in GC (→GE) is probably an oversight. Similarly in bar 65. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of this mark is most probably an oversight of the copyist, repeated in GE. It is also the notation of the slur in this bar (the adjacent note) that is linked to it. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The comparison with the respective bar of the recapitulation (bar 196), as well as with analogous motifs in bars 52 and 180 and 50, 66, 178 and 194, makes us consider the version of GC to be erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
|
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the ties sustaining the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
2-e
