FE1
compare
|
No mark in all sources |
|
|
Accent suggested by the editors |
The missing accent on the 2nd quaver must be considered an inaccuracy of notation (most probably Chopin's inadvertence in [A]). The accent is present in identical b. 35 as well as in a rhythmically analogous situation in each of the remaining bars of the section encompassing b. 25-36.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins