Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-30
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
According to us, the most likely explanation for the existing discrepancy between the sources based on [A] is the sometimes used by the engravers identification of two (or more) following 
signs with one longer. A possible Chopin's correction in [A], introduced already after preparing GC, which is potentially an alternative explanation, seems to be poorly justified:
-
two do not exclude a continuous crescendo, therefore, there is no need to combine the signs;
- only the separate signs show also a dynamic change defining the character of the one-bar repetitive motifs, ended with an accent.
Due to this fact, in the main text we give the source and stylistically unquestionable indications of GC (→GE).
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: FE revisions, Hairpins denoting continuation
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FESch, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2