Issues : Hairpins denoting continuation
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the most likely explanation for the existing discrepancy between the sources based on [A] is the sometimes used by the engravers identification of two (or more) following signs with one longer. A possible Chopin's correction in [A], introduced already after preparing GC, which is potentially an alternative explanation, seems to be poorly justified:
Due to this fact, in the main text we give the source and stylistically unquestionable indications of GC (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
One sign in FE (→EE) is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE. It is proved by bars 214-215, in which all sources have a one-bar-long compatible , which in the manuscripts, hence also in the base text to FE, was marked only as repetition of the discussed bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||
b. 69-70
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||
b. 193
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
One longer sign in FE (→EE), including also bar 194, is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||
b. 194
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Adding in FE (→EE) to the sign in bar 193 is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |