Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 154-156
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The missing staccato dots in FE (→EE) seem to be an oversight of the engraver. The second dot in GC (in bar 156) blends into the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 154
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
FE1 features C at the beginning of the bar, which is a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 182
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE (→EE1) the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 183
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version with d1 (=e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
|
b. 198-199
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The tie sustaining b category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
mistake, which explains its absence in 
before the top most note is already before the 1st chord. It is hard to say how the mistake, which had to be already in [A], occurred (corrections?). In addition, in the proofreading of 
before c
1. It is either a mistake of the engraver or a missed revision. In 
1) is probably erroneous – situations in which there is no sign, cancelling the previous alteration, belong to the most frequently encountered inaccuracies of Chopin's notation. Moreover, it is likely that the composer rectified his mistake, while correcting the base text to 
