![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 65-84
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
In GC, same as in bar 16 (bar 70 is only marked as its repetition), the end of the slur may be interpreted in two ways. In the main text, we give a more likely, conventional interpretation of this detail, present in the majority of the editions – only in GE1 the end of the slur was reproduced literally, whereas in FE1 (→FE2) the slur in bars 69-70 was totally overlooked.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE, Authentic corrections of EE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
FESch, FES, FED, FE2, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, GC, FE5, GE2mar, Amar