Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 43-64
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-64
p. 4, b. 65-84
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Amar - Autograph fragment of March
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2mar - Second German edition of March
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Amar - Autograph fragment of March
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2mar - Second German edition of March
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition


  b. 45-46

  in GC

  in FE (→EE)

 & accent in GE1

  in GE2mar (→GE2)

The present in these bars pair of   hairpins shows significant differences, as far as the range of both signs in particular sources is concerned. In the case of the first of them, we consider only the differences concerning the moment of beginning of the sign to be significant. We consider the versions of GC and FE – sources based on [A] – to be equal variants, out of which we choose the version of the base source (FE) to the main text. The differences in the range of the  hairpin that do not exceed one quaver seem to be unimportant; only their reproduction in GE1 as an accent is certainly a mistake.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FES, FED, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, FE5, GE2mar, Amar