Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 27-54
p. 1
p. 2, b. 1-26
p. 3, b. 27-54
p. 4, b. 55-84
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Amar - Autograph fragment of March
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2mar - Second German edition of March
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Amar - Autograph fragment of March
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
FE5 - Second French edition
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2mar - Second German edition of March
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FESch - Scherbatoff Copy

Original in: Harvard University, Houghton Library, Cambridge MA


  b. 45

Long accent in GC & GE2

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE1 (→GE2mar)

It is not clear whether according to Chopin the sign at the beginning of the bar was supposed to be a long accent, as it can be considered on the basis of GC and GE2, or rather a diminuendo, as it was written in FE (→EE). Taking into account the fact that in each of the cases the sign refers to the R.H., the difference in the performance may be imperceptible. To the main text we adopt an interpretation of the base source, i.e. FE.
The absence of the sign in GE1 (→GE2mar) is undoubtedly an oversight.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Errors in GE, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FES, FED, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, FE5, GE2mar, Amar