Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The present in these bars pair of hairpins shows significant differences, as far as the range of both signs in particular sources is concerned. In the case of the first of them, we consider only the differences concerning the moment of beginning of the sign to be significant. We consider the versions of GC and FE – sources based on [A] – to be equal variants, out of which we choose the version of the base source (FE) to the main text. The differences in the range of the hairpin that do not exceed one quaver seem to be unimportant; only their reproduction in GE1 as an accent is certainly a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The clearly long accent in GC (in bar 14, whose repetition bar 68 is) was reproduced in GE as a short one. The sign was added also in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The signs in GC and FE may be considered to be equal variants. Due to the reasons discussed in bar 16, in the main text we give the version of FE. The sign in GE1 is clearly inaccurate, which was corrected (also inaccurately) in the subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »