Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 71-88
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 3, b. 29-48
p. 4, b. 49-70
p. 5, b. 71-88
p. 6, b. 89-101
Main text
Main text
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German Edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois's copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Later impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German Edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois's copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Later impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 83

Minim a1-a2 in GE

Dotted minim in FE

EE1 (→EE2)

Only a2 with a dot in EE3

The rhythm notation in GE, in which the rhythmic values of both marked voices of the R.H. add up to a dotted minim written in the L.H., is formally correct and makes musical and pianistic sense. There is no reason to doubt its compliance with [A]. Adding in FE (→EE1EE2) of the dots extending the octave a1-a2 is most probably the engraver's fault, as he failed to grasp that the minim d sharp 2 was supposed to sound on the 3rd beat of the bar together with g sharp1-f sharp2-g sharp2. The version of EE3, clearly erroneous, could have originated as a result of an unfinished attempt to restore the version of  GE.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, FE revisions

notation: Rhythm