Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 29-52
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3
p. 4, b. 1-14
p. 5, b. 15-28
p. 6, b. 29-52
p. 7, b. 53-83
p. 8, b. 84-101
p. 9
p. 10
p. 11
p. 12
p. 13
p. 14
GE1 - First German Edition
Main text
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German Edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois's copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Later impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German Edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois's copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE2 - Second impression of EE1
EE3 - Later impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GE1 - First German Edition

Original in: Fryderyk Chopin Museum, Warsaw


  b. 50

R.H. quaver over the 6th L.H. note in GE (→FE)

Regular rhythmic notation in EE

In GE (→FE) notes of the R.H. rhythm are distributed in such a way that the quaver is aligned with the 6th L.H. note. In the editors' opinion, this probably does not reflect the notation of [A], and has no impact on the performance. In the main text, we apply the regular rhythmic notation, so did EE.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Dotted rhythms and triplets

notation: Rhythm