mUltimate Chopin

Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 129-160
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-64
p. 3, b. 65-96
p. 4, b. 97-128
p. 5, b. 129-160
p. 6, b. 161-192
Main text
Main text
As - Autograph sketch
AI - Autograph Rothschild
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1op - First German edition of Op. 64
GE1no2 - First German edition of Waltz No 2
GE2op - Second German edition of Op. 64
GE2no2 - Second German edition of Waltz No 2
GE3op - Corrected impression of GE2op
EE - English Edition
EEC - Earliest English edition
EEW1 - First English edition
EEW2 - Revised impression of EEW1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
As - Autograph sketch
AI - Autograph Rothschild
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1op - First German edition of Op. 64
GE1no2 - First German edition of Waltz No 2
GE2op - Second German edition of Op. 64
GE2no2 - Second German edition of Waltz No 2
GE3op - Corrected impression of GE2op
EE - English Edition
EEC - Earliest English edition
EEW1 - First English edition
EEW2 - Revised impression of EEW1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF -

  b. 140-141

 in A (probable interpretation→FE→EEC) & GE2no2

 in A, possible interpretation

No sign in GE1op, GE1no2 & EEW1

 in GE2op (→GE3op) & EEW2

The interpretation of the range of  in A – see bar 13. The solution adopted by us finds confirmation in the notation of FE (→EEC), being probably a result of a proofreading, a Chopin one. It is indicated by the absence of the hairpin both in GE1op and GE1no2, which makes us assume that it was originally absent in FE too. In turn, the missing sign in EEW1 is certainly an oversight – the hairpin was overlooked also in adjacent bars 138-139 and 142-144.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, As, AI, FE1, FED, FES, GE1op, GE2op, GE1no2, EEC, EEW1, EEW2, GE2no2, GE3op
Complete ➔