mUltimate Chopin

Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 97-128
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-64
p. 3, b. 65-96
p. 4, b. 97-128
p. 5, b. 129-160
p. 6, b. 161-192
Main text
Main text
As - Autograph sketch
AI - Autograph Rothschild
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1op - First German edition of Op. 64
GE1no2 - First German edition of Waltz No 2
GE2op - Second German edition of Op. 64
GE2no2 - Second German edition of Waltz No 2
GE3op - Corrected impression of GE2op
EE - English Edition
EEC - Earliest English edition
EEW1 - First English edition
EEW2 - Revised impression of EEW1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
As - Autograph sketch
AI - Autograph Rothschild
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1op - First German edition of Op. 64
GE1no2 - First German edition of Waltz No 2
GE2op - Second German edition of Op. 64
GE2no2 - Second German edition of Waltz No 2
GE3op - Corrected impression of GE2op
EE - English Edition
EEC - Earliest English edition
EEW1 - First English edition
EEW2 - Revised impression of EEW1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF -

  b. 104

No accidental in As & A (→FE→EEC) – f2

 in AI – f2

 in GE & EEW1 (→EEW2) – f2

Same as in bars 40 and 56, Chopin hesitated whether the last quaver in bars 104 and 120 is to be a f2 or f2 and the final decision is not unambiguous. In the main text, we give the version with f2, written in A (→FE) and made more precise by the way we adopted in our system with a cautionary . The version with f2, as well as the notation without an accidental, leaving a minor margin of uncertainty, can be considered to be equal variants. 

See b. 40-56

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations

issues:

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: A, As, AI, FE1, FED, FES, GE1op, GE2op, GE1no2, EEC, EEW1, EEW2, GE2no2, GE3op
Complete ➔