Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of slurs both in AI and in FE (→EE,GE1op,GE1no2) certainly does not express Chopin's intentions – in the manuscript the slurs were overlooked until bar 16, whereas FE lacks in them also in bar 12. In FE it is bars 138-139 that prove the accidental oversight, in which a slur compatible with A was most probably added by Chopin in the last stage of proofreading. The phrasing mark is also absent in As, in which, however, Chopin wrote two motivic slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
On the available photocopy of A, the slur in bar 12 starts from the 3rd quaver. We shift the beginning one quaver earlier, analogously to bar 10. In FE (→EE,GE1op,GE1no2) the slur starts – undoubtedly erroneously – only in bar 13, however in bar 140, based on the notation of bar 12 in A, the slur of FE begins exactly on the 2nd quaver of the bar, which supports the solution we adopted. In later GE, the starting point of the slur was moved to the beginning of bar 12, most probably by analogy to the notation of bars 140-141 in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
No pedalling in the editions – the indications were added only in GE2no2 – is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of FE. Similarly in bar 30. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in 
