



Pitch
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
As has two versions in this place; we assume that the second one, written over the staff of the main course of music and identical to the final version of bar 88, is intended for this exact bar. The first version is also a result of corrections – cf. the note to bar 69. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Main-line changes |
||||||
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Three versions of the accompaniment prove that Chopin would be looking for the best harmonic and rhythmic formula for these bars. The process lasted until the last moment, since the version adopted in the main text, with a sustained chord, was introduced by the composer only in the final stage of proofreading of FE (→EE). He also hesitated – in A one can see deletions proving several corrections whose final result was a version identical with the original one, written in As, whereas AI has a different text too. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 77-80
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The version of As undoubtedly gives way to both later ones, which, actually, differ only in two elements – the rhythm of the melody in bar 77 and the number of touches in the part of the L.H. in bar 79. The same as in bar 71, the change of rhythm in bar 77 could have been introduced in A as a correction of the earlier rhythm of the crotchets. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes |
||||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Moving the moment of introducing e1 after e category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |