mUltimate Chopin

Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 99-128

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

Similarly as in bars 35-64 (in the autographs the discussed bars are their literal repetition), the slurs are written only in A (→FE→GE,EE). A few situations, in which the sources differ in the notation of slurs, are discussed separately, including the slur of a non-obvious range present in AI in bars 113-114, being a repetition of bars 33-34.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 103

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Slur from 1st quaver in A, GE & EE

Slur from 2nd quaver in FE
..

The version of FE is probably inaccurate – see bar 39.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 114-115

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Slur up to bar 114 in AI

Slur up to bar 118 in A (→FE→EE,GE1no2,GE1op→GE2op→GE3op)

Slur up to bar 128 in GE2no2
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 118-119

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

Same as in bars 54-55, GE2no2 arbitrarily combined the slurs here.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 129-130

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

EEC overlooked the slur over the part of the R.H., which is certainly a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE