![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 143
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest a variant solution, as the absence of category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 147-148
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In bars 147-148 and 151-152 we suggest a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 159-160
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The g category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 32, Chopin introduced the change of c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE , Bass register changes |
|||||||
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |