Issues : GE revisions
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
No pedalling in the editions – the indications were added only in GE2no2 – is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of FE. Similarly in bar 30. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In FE and in a part of the remaining editions, the sign was placed same as in the remaining bars, after the 3rd crotchet. The fact of moving the sign under the crotchet may be considered to be a revision or inaccuracy of GE1op, EE and GE2no2. Similarly in bar 31. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 29, the sign, misplaced in FE under the last quaver, was moved in EEW1 (→EEW2) and GE2no2 under the 3rd beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEC,EEW1) there are no pedalling indications in this bar, which is almost certainly an oversight. The signs were added in later editions on the basis of a patent analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 54-55
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In GE2no2 the slurs between bars 54-55 were combined, which is contrary to the notation of A and the remaining editions. Similarly in bars 118-119 and 182-183. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |