![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE inaccuracies
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 129-160
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Placement of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 133-134
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The lack of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 138-139
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the slur in both versions of GE1 means that most probably it was originally absent in FE too, in which, however, it was added – probably by Chopin – in the last phase of proofreading. The slurs added in later GE, embracing two full bars, are a result of a revision, same as in bars 10-11. In turn, an earlier beginning of the slur in EEC may be simply an inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 162-172
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 33-44 (in the autographs the discussed bars are not written out), we reproduce the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »