![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 22, the absence of pedalling in the editions is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
It is uncertain whether Chopin considered the
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
On the photographs of A available to us, it is impossible to state whether on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar there are c
Similarly in bars 106 and 170. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEC,EEW1) there are no pedalling indications in this bar, which is almost certainly an oversight. The signs were added in later editions on the basis of a patent analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 68-84
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In bars 68, 72 and 84 FE (→GE,EE) omitted the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |