



b. 17-25
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In As the bars are not written out with notes. Chopin wrote only empty bars, which undoubtedly means repeating bars 1-9. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Both the additional slur in bars 16-17 and the visible connection of slurs at the transition between these bars in A clearly prove Chopin's intention with regard to the phrasing in this place. The two-bar slur of AI cannot be considered to be a full-fledged variant in this situation, particularly considering the fact that Chopin did not write slurring in bars 9-16 in this autograph at all. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 2, in the previous manuscripts there is no category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
On the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. A has – in so far as it may be assumed on the basis of the photography available to us – a g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 19-24
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |