Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A there is no cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 93-98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The notation of the accidentals in this fragment of A is inaccurate – there is not any flat lowering e2(1) to e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The slur over the pair of chords could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE. In GE1Ab it was moved under the chords, as a result of which it can be considered to be a tie of f1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A there are no accidentals in the part of the R.H. This patent in this context oversight was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
before a. In this context, it must be considered an oversight, particularly taking into account the fact that the sign was written in 
2(1) in bars 94, 96 and 98. It is probably an echo of the draft notation of 
