Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The use of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The wedge in GC, confirmed by EE, was reproduced in GE as a staccato dot. Therefore, the evaluation of the authenticity of the dot in FE also advises caution. The tendency to interpret wedges as dots was very clear in the B&H publishing houses – cf., e.g., the Nocturne in D category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Wedges |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
We preserve the notation of GC, in which the accent (long) is not related to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the wedge for the L.H. may correspond to the notation of the base text to FE, however, it cannot be excluded that the engraver confused the wedge for a fingering numeral. In the remaining sources the wedges are present in the parts of both hands (except for GE1, in which the signs were undoubtedly misinterpreted as staccato dots). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the long accent written in GC and printed in this form also in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
time signature surprises only in 
indication was not used in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, both in Op. 25 and in 
major, 
minor, Op. 39, 
in 
