Issues : Long accents
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The long accent, present only in GC (→GE1), could have been added there by Chopin. In GE2 (→GE3) it was replaced with a standard, short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The accents on the 4th beat, present only in GC (→GE), were most probably added in the copy by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give a long accent after FE. An accent – short – is also in EE, which means that the sign was most probably added by Chopin in the base texts to these editions or that the copyist accidentally omitted it. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the long accent written in GC and printed in this form also in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 81
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
It is not entirely clear which type of accent Chopin had on his mind here. According to us, an inaccurate reproduction of the long accent in EE is, however, more likely than the reverse situation – the copyist's writing a long accent in place of the short sign in [A]. The sign in GC, very characteristic for Chopin's handwriting, could have been written with his hand. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
