mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 80-81

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Slur in GC (contextual interpretation), FE, EE & GE2 (→GE3)

No slur in GE1
..

The missing slur in GE1 is undoubtedly a mistake – it may be that the engraver could not decide how to recreate the ambiguous slur of GC (see bars 79-80) and eventually forgot about this troublesome sign.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 95

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

L.H. slur in GC (→GE)
..

Lack of the slur in the L.H. in FE and EE suggests that the slur in GC (→GE) could have been added by Chopin, perhaps in relation to the inaccurately drawn slur in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections in GC