



Slurs
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The missing slurs in the majority of the sources must be considered as Chopin's oversight. We suggest slurs used in analogous bars 7-8. An identical addition was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Only FE includes two slurs under the part of the L.H. – phrasing and tie sustaining D. In the main text we consider both of them, yet we shape the phrasing slur in such a way that it is clear which notes it concerns. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The slur of the L.H. begins in GC more or less in the middle of the 1st beat of the bar, so GE1 embraced also the 1st octave with it. This undoubtedly erroneous interpretation was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). Similarly in bar 47. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 45, in GE1 the slur starts from the beginning of the bar, which is an erroneous interpretation of the too broad slur of GC. In addition, in GE1 the slur is led only to the b at the beginning of bar 48, which is a totally unjustified arbitrary decision of the engraver. GE2 (→GE3) re-established the notation of GC, compatible with the remaining sources. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |