Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The use of the time signature is surprising only in GE1, as FE did not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – even once, neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10 and in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). Anyways, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable with respect to the compatible version of GC and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||
b. 58-60
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur embracing the phrase in the middle voice was added by Chopin most probably in the proofreading of FE. The sign is, however, inaccurately placed – in bar 58, ending a line of the text, the slur begins on the stave, yet its continuation in bars 59-60 is under the stave, which hinders its interpretation. In the analogous place in bars 78-80, the slur is already clearly placed. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 79-82
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Omission of the pedalling signs in FE in bar 80 is certainly an oversight (cf. bars 31-32), therefore, in the main text we suggest to complete them after all previous analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |