Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Chopin added the grace note in GC (it is written with his hand) and probably also in the base text to EE.
The issue of cautionary sharps before the grace note and d category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 79-82
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Omission of the pedalling signs in FE in bar 80 is certainly an oversight (cf. bars 31-32), therefore, in the main text we suggest to complete them after all previous analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
|||||||||||
|
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
For the third time (after bar 45 and 65) Chopin did not add the rit. indication. According to us, it is an oversight, hence in the main text we suggest adding this indication. A respective revision was performed already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
|||||||||||
|
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Lack of the grace note is probably a result of Chopin's oversight – both in this and the previous bars a few elements, added by Chopin in analogous bars 47 and 67, e.g., rit. and an accent, are missing. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding an ornament (in the form of non-slashed grace note) and cautionary sharps before the grace note and d category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
in 
d
3 suggested by the editors
in 
