Issues : GE revisions
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The missing slur combining d and e in GC (→GE1) is most probably the copyist's mistake – in the analogous bar 76 a relevant slur is present in GC. Both the addition of the slur in GE2 and its removal in GE3 are arbitrary changes, harmonising both places. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The sign added in GE2 is a result of comparison with the analogous bar 79. In turn, the sign in EE may be authentic, although also in this case a revision cannot be excluded. GE3 reintroduced the notation of the base text (if the lack of hairpins is not a print defect, resulting from the tear and wear of plates). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Chopin added the grace note in GC (it is written with his hand) and probably also in the base text to EE. The issue of cautionary sharps before the grace note and d3 – see the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we include the long accent, written – probably by Chopin – in GC (→GE1). In later GE it was arbitrarily changed to . category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |