Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 39-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GE1 the sempre piano indication, in GC and EE placed under the part of the L.H. in bar 39, was assigned to bar 46, written below. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3), yet moving the indication between the staves. Despite the fact that the indication is placed in a similar way in FE, one can have doubts whether it corresponds to Chopin's intention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 42-44
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur of the L.H. in GC (→GE1) is certainly erroneous – the copyist, probably confused with the transition into the new line, wrote in bars 43-44 a slur which was supposed to concern bars 42-43. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The erroneous value of the bass e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
raising e1 to e
1. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
before e. The sign was already added in 
(error) in 
in 
in