Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
When adding the sign, Chopin probably omitted the base text to FE (see bars 15-16). The placement of the sign under the bottom stave could have resulted from the will to connect crescendo with the progression in the L.H. or due to lack of space between the staves. In the case of the latter, shifting the sign in GE2 (→GE3) would have been justified. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Same as in the case of the remaining signs in bars 15-20, the missing accent in FE is probably Chopin's oversight. The sign in GC and EE is clearly shorter than the previous ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we give differentiated accents, written most probably with Chopin's hand in GC. GE reproduced all of them as short ones, EE too. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Possible doubts concerning the type and placement of the accent are dissipated by the sign written – probably by Chopin – in analogous bar 67. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »