|
b. 39-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 39-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GE1 the sempre piano indication, in GC and EE placed under the part of the L.H. in bar 39, was assigned to bar 46, written below. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3), yet moving the indication between the staves. Despite the fact that the indication is placed in a similar way in FE, one can have doubts whether it corresponds to Chopin's intention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 42-44
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur of the L.H. in GC (→GE1) is certainly erroneous – the copyist, probably confused with the transition into the new line, wrote in bars 43-44 a slur which was supposed to concern bars 42-43. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Chopin added the rit. indication in GC (→GE) in pencil. It was also repeated in EE3 on the basis of GE1. Similarly in bar 65. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The erroneous value of the bass e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
(error) in 
in 
in 
– double dotted minim – written in