



b. 86
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we suggest – after GE2 (→GE3) – the solutions adopted in analogous bars 46 and 66. Lack of additions in bars 85 and 87 proves that by correcting and completing the Stichvorlage manuscripts, Chopin omitted, probably by distraction, the third appearance of this fragment. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Lack of the grace note is probably a result of Chopin's oversight – both in this and the previous bars a few elements, added by Chopin in analogous bars 47 and 67, e.g., rit. and an accent, are missing. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding an ornament (in the form of non-slashed grace note) and cautionary sharps before the grace note and d category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
|||||
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we suggest adding an accent after the previous analogous bars, in which Chopin included it in all (bar 47) or certain sources (GC in bar 67). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 87-89
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 90-98
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The sources include sharps before all a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |