Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 15-17
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The hairpins written in GC are certainly too long – leading the diminuendo one quaver beyond placed at the beginning of the new phrase is unable to be performed in a noticeable manner (cf. the Etude in A minor, No. 11, bar 16). Therefore, in the main text we end the sign still in bar 16, in accordance with FE, EE and GE2 (→GE3). In turn, both potentially authentic moments of beginning the sign – in GC and in FE and EE – are, according to us, equally justified, as far as the music is concerned. The slight shift of the beginning of in GE is a typical inaccuracy of this edition – adjustment of the range of the sign to the rhythmic structure (most often to beams). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The missing staccato sign in GC (→GE) is most probably a result of the copyist's distraction. In the main text we give the dot of FE, as in a similar context at the end of the Etude, all sources feature a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The missing in GC (→GE) is probably the copyist's oversight. It is also possible that Chopin omitted this copy, adding the indication in the Stichvorlage manuscripts. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |