mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Inaccuracies in GC

b. 15-17

composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major

 in GC

 in FE & EE

 in GE1

 in GE2 (→GE3)

 suggested by the editors
..

The  hairpins written in GC are certainly too long – leading the diminuendo one quaver beyond  placed at the beginning of the new phrase is unable to be performed in a noticeable manner (cf. the Etude in A minor, No. 11, bar 16). Therefore, in the main text we end the sign still in bar 16, in accordance with FE, EE and GE2 (→GE3). In turn, both potentially authentic moments of beginning the sign – in GC and in FE and EE – are, according to us, equally justified, as far as the music is concerned. The slight shift of the beginning of  in GE is a typical inaccuracy of this edition – adjustment of the range of the sign to the rhythmic structure (most often to beams).    

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 49

composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major

No mark in GC (→GE)

Dot in FE

Wedge in EE
..

The missing staccato sign in GC (→GE) is most probably a result of the copyist's distraction. In the main text we give the dot of FE, as in a similar context at the end of the Etude, all sources feature a dot.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 50

composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major

No marking in GC (→GE)

in FE & EE
..

The missing  in GC (→GE) is probably the copyist's oversight. It is also possible that Chopin omitted this copy, adding the indication in the Stichvorlage manuscripts.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GC