![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 2, b. 11-22
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
The type of the sign indicating the local culmination and its exact placement raise some doubts here:
-
present in A (→GE) could have been replaced with
in the base texts to FE and EE1, which, in this situation, would have been Chopin's latest decision;
-
the
signs in FE and EE1 (→EE2) are placed slightly later and in different places, hence one can suspect an inaccurate reproduction of Chopin's notation or its misunderstanding.
In the main text we suggest a as a result of Chopin's possible correction, placed in accordance with the musical sense at the beginning of the bar.
EE3 adopted the version of GE.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: fz – f, Centrally placed marks
notation: Verbal indications
Missing markers on sources:
A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3