Issues : Errors in EE
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
In A (→GE1), FE and EE there is no returning f2 in the penultimate sixth. This patent error was noticed only in GE2 (→GE3) on the occasion of a thorough revision of accidentals – cf. the notes concerning the natural and flat before the previous sixth. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||||||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
In A, FE and EE1 there is no cancellation of a few previously raised notes in chromatic passages:
The remaining editions introduced additions to these patent oversights (some of all): category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
The fingering of the beginning of the phrase was added by Chopin most probably at the time of proofreading FE. It was then repeated – with errors – in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 32-33
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
The partially different fingering of EE (the differences include 5 sixths, from the 6th to the 10th quaver in bar 32) is uncomfortable to such an extent that one can suspect a mistake of the engraver who could have, for example, mistaken the groups of quavers – he wrote the fingering of the 9th and 10th sixths over the 6th and 7th quavers, while he placed the numerals foreseen for the 5th-7th sixths over the 8th-10th quavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Differences in fingering , Authentic corrections of FE |