mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Long accents

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 4

composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor

No mark in GC (→GE) & EE

Long accent in FE
..

The exclusive presence of the accent in FE suggests that it was added by Chopin in the proofreading of this edition (or still in the handwritten base text). The length of the accent is indicated by its placement to the right from the note. Similarly in bar 8, where the sign is not only moved, but also longer.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 8

composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor

No mark in GC (→GE) & EE

Long accent in FE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 24

composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor

 in GC (→GE)

Short accent on d1 in FE & EE

Possible long accent
..

The sign in GC does not seem to be an accent on d1 – it is clearly placed between the notes, rather closer to the c1 quaver and it is clearly symmetrical in relation to the  hairpins in bar 23. Short accents visible in this place in FE and EE suggest, however, a possibility of an inaccurate reproduction of the notation of [A] by Gutmann. Therefore, we suggest a long accent as an alternative interpretation of the notation of all sources. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents