Issues : EE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire opus in FC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
FE, EE1 and GE1 misinterpreted the abbreviated notation of FC and of the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, giving the 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups of semiquavers without any accidentals. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). Similarly in almost all analogous places – cf. bars 8, 20 and 36, as well as 12 and 40. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Chopin added the fingering digit over the last semiquaver probably in the proofreading of FE. The same digit added in EE2 (→EE3) is most probably an editorial revision, introduced probably on the basis of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The sources differ in notation of the accidentals on the 1st and 4th semiquavers of the last group. Due to the regularity of the figurations, it can be assumed that Chopin was thinking about b2-d3 and d3-f3. When the group is written without the octave sign, the text does not require any signs and this is the notation we see in FE. In the remaining sources, an octave sign was used (same as in the main text), which leads to the need of making the notation more precise:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 4, FE, EE1 and GE1 misinterpreted here the abbreviated notation of FC and of the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, giving the 2nd, 3rd and 4th group of semiquavers without any accidentals. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |