![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of FC
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1) the last two semiquavers in these bars were erroneously copied from the next group (the 3rd and 4th semiquaver in bar 6). The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The sources differ in notation of the accidentals on the 1st and 4th semiquavers of the last group. Due to the regularity of the figurations, it can be assumed that Chopin was thinking about b
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In front of the 2nd semiquaver in each of these bars, there are no accidentals in the sources except for naturals added in GE2 (→GE3), which cannot come from Chopin. Therefore, it seems that the top note is supposed to be a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Last key signature sign , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The third quaver in FC is incomplete and, hence, illegible. One can see there traces of an unfinished correction – the note head of the A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The sharp returning c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of FC |